Listen to this article with AI
What To Know
- Earlier this year, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences clarified its rules, confirming that the use of AI tools neither improves nor damages a film’s chances of nomination.
- Lew describes AI as “a paintbrush, not the painter,” a line that has quickly become a talking point across the industry.
- Another qualifier, Flower_Gan, used a custom-built AI system to explore the emotional and societal consequences of artificial intelligence itself, turning the technology into both subject and tool.
The Oscars Have Entered the AI Era
The Academy Awards have officially stepped into the future. For the first time, films created using generative artificial intelligence are eligible to compete for Oscars, marking a major turning point in Hollywood history.
Earlier this year, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences clarified its rules, confirming that the use of AI tools neither improves nor damages a film’s chances of nomination. In short, AI is now considered just another tool in the filmmaking process — like CGI, editing software, or visual effects.
This quiet but powerful decision has already reshaped the 2026 awards race.
AI Is No Longer Behind the Scenes
In previous years, AI was used discreetly for voice enhancement, visual tweaks, or post-production fixes. Films such as Dune: Part Two and Emilia Pérez acknowledged limited AI use only after questions surfaced during campaigning.
This year is different. Some filmmakers are openly embracing AI as part of the creative identity of their work.
One standout example is Ahimsa, an animated short film by former DreamWorks animator Craig Lew. The project proudly discloses its use of generative AI tools for visuals, while combining them with traditional motion capture, human-led animation, and an original musical score.
Lew describes AI as “a paintbrush, not the painter,” a line that has quickly become a talking point across the industry.
Not All AI Use Is the Same
While AI is now allowed, how it’s used matters.
Oscar-winning filmmakers Michael Govier and Will McCormack took a more controlled approach with their animated short All Heart. They worked with a closed AI model trained only on their original artwork, ensuring creative ownership and ethical sourcing.
Another qualifier, Flower_Gan, used a custom-built AI system to explore the emotional and societal consequences of artificial intelligence itself, turning the technology into both subject and tool.
These projects show that AI in cinema isn’t one-size-fits-all — it ranges from enhancement to experimentation.
The Creative Backlash Is Growing
Despite the rule change, the decision hasn’t been universally welcomed.
Many filmmakers and artists remain deeply uncomfortable with open-source AI models that scrape vast amounts of online content. Critics argue this threatens originality and undermines the value of human craftsmanship. Others worry that the floodgates are opening too fast, without clear ethical guardrails.
Still, supporters say transparency is the key difference now. By openly declaring AI use, filmmakers allow voters to judge the work with full awareness.
What This Means for Hollywood’s Future
The Academy’s move makes one thing clear: AI is no longer a side conversation in entertainment — it’s part of the mainstream.
As Oscar voters begin reviewing eligible films, the industry faces a new question: should innovation be judged differently from tradition, or should storytelling always come first?
For better or worse, the Oscars have made their choice. The AI era isn’t coming — it’s already rolling the credits.
