What To Know
- This is a very small formidable demographic which is quite different from the all round appeal that is needed for a blockbuster movie.
- The “Mad Max” saga has always focused on the fans and tends to attract a much smaller audience in comparison with those mass audience films like “Star Wars” or “Jurassic World.
- Some sources observed that the poker-faced industry has opted for high risk in getting a prequel off the ground with a new lead … The marketing was perceived as too similar to “Mad Max.
This long weekend of the Memorial Day, the film business is under a lot of pressure. The George Miller-directed prequel “Furiosa,” a tentpole to the multi-Oscar-winning “Mad Max: “Fury Road,” is expected to open with a meager $31M-$33M. This is the worst Memorial Day opening in the theaters in over twenty-five years, even worse than 1995 Casper which grossed twenty-two million dollars. Adding to the woes, the Alcon/Sony production Garfield, could possibly gain more, and finish the 4 day long weekend with better figures.
Audience and Market Analysis
Yet, “Furiosa” received rather positive reviews and has a PostTrak exit rating of 4 1/2 stars, it seems to struggle with reaching the wider viewership. Demographics of this show’s audience were 2% of them was 13-17 years old, 29% of them were women and 9% of them were adults over 55 years of age. This is a very small formidable demographic which is quite different from the all round appeal that is needed for a blockbuster movie.
“Mad Max: Fury Road” opened to $45. It was budgeted for $4M in 2015 and in the end grossed $154. 2M domestically and $380. 4M worldwide. Nevertheless, the “Mad Max” saga has always focused on the fans and tends to attract a much smaller audience in comparison with those mass audience films like “Star Wars” or “Jurassic World. ”
Factors Affecting ‘Furiosa’s’ Performance
Several factors contribute to the underperformance of “Furiosa”:Several factors contribute to the underperformance of “Furiosa”:
Fanbase Limitations: The “Mad Max” has always been a limited cash cow, the geek culture interest, which targets only a certain group of film-goers.
Marketing Missteps: Some sources observed that the poker-faced industry has opted for high risk in getting a prequel off the ground with a new lead … The marketing was perceived as too similar to “Mad Max: Fury Road, and started too late.
Audience Confusion: This was followed by the complaint that the trailer was noisy, and people could not fully understand the story behind the film.
Missed Opportunities: While using the actress Charlize Theron instead of Anya Taylor-Joy, the company may have attracted more viewers, however, using this strategy’s cost efficiency is questionable.
Industry Context and Implication Environments or Industries have been shown to dictate the levels of innovation, and more specifically, appropriate technological advancement that applies to product development.
The theatrical industry is not entirely doomed, as proven by successful releases such as “Dune,” “Godzilla x Kong,” “Barbie,” “Oppenheimer,” “Top Gun: Happy feet, maverick, the little mermaid. The main problem is that the show’s content deals with animation. Hence, “Furiosa” and similar films can never be popular, mainstream cinema, if they are not marketed and made in this way.
